<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Employed on LinkedIn? You&#8217;re Hired.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonspector.com/2009/12/self-employed-linkedin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonspector.com/2009/12/self-employed-linkedin/</link>
	<description>crowdsourcing &#124; user experience &#124; social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:37:36 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Case Ernsting</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonspector.com/2009/12/self-employed-linkedin/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Case Ernsting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonspector.com/?p=720#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Fascinating post, Jason. Why do you think there is such an overwhelming percentage of men in the &quot;Self Employed&quot; category? Your approach to crowdsourcing is very eye-opening and I&#039;m learning from it.

I think you&#039;re spot on with your recommendations to lose the &quot;Self-Employed&quot; moniker and go with a self-titled brand.  I am willing to bet this strategy helps the personal psyche of those out of work as well.  Do you think there are some string attached when John Smith titles his services &quot;Smith Consulting&quot;? For example, are their undue expectations created (website, business card, legal concerns) for clients looking to hire Mr. Smith? Can&#039;t wait to hear your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating post, Jason. Why do you think there is such an overwhelming percentage of men in the &#8220;Self Employed&#8221; category? Your approach to crowdsourcing is very eye-opening and I&#8217;m learning from it.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re spot on with your recommendations to lose the &#8220;Self-Employed&#8221; moniker and go with a self-titled brand.  I am willing to bet this strategy helps the personal psyche of those out of work as well.  Do you think there are some string attached when John Smith titles his services &#8220;Smith Consulting&#8221;? For example, are their undue expectations created (website, business card, legal concerns) for clients looking to hire Mr. Smith? Can&#8217;t wait to hear your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
